Pennsylvania Supreme Court
|Pennsylvania Supreme Court|
|Method:||Partisan election of judges|
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the court of last resort for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It was established by the Pennsylvania Provincial Assembly in 1722 as a successor to a Provincial Appellate Court that had been established in 1684. It is the oldest continually sitting appellate court in North America.
JusticesThe current justices of the court are:
|Justice J. Michael Eakin||2001-2021||Republican|
|Chief Justice Ronald Castille||1993-2023||Republican|
|Justice Thomas Saylor||1993 - Present||Republican|
|Justice Max Baer||2003 - 2023||Democratic|
|Justice Debra Todd||2000-2017||Democratic|
|Justice Correale Stevens||2013-2016||Gov. Tom Corbett||Republican|
The justice with the longest continuous service on the supreme court automatically becomes Chief Justice.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is an appellate court, with limited original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction is only in cases of habeas corpus, mandamus, and quo warranto. It meets in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Harrisburg.
The Pennsylvania Supreme court consists of seven justices each elected to ten-year terms. Supreme court judicial candidates may run on party tickets. The justice with the longest continuous service on the supreme court automatically becomes Chief Justice. Supreme Court justices, like other Pennsylvania judges, are subject to mandatory retirement when they turn 70 years old. After the ten-year term expires, a statewide YES/NO vote for retention is conducted. If the judge is retained, he/she serves another ten-year term. If the judge is not retained, the governor, subject to the approval of the State Senate, appoints a temporary replacement until a special election can be held. As of 2005, only one judge has failed to win retention. Justice Russell Nigro received a majority of "NO" votes in the election of 2005 and was replaced by Justice Cynthia Baldwin, who was appointed by Governor Ed Rendell in 2005.
A qualified candidate must be a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and a citizen of the state.
In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan outlook of state supreme court justices in their paper, State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns. A score above 0 indicated a more conservative leaning ideology while scores below 0 were more liberal. The state Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was given a Campaign finance score (CFscore) which was calculated for judges in October 2012. At that time, Pennsylvania received a score of -0.02. Based on the justices selected, Pennsylvania was the 24th most liberal court. The study is based on data from campaign contributions by judges themselves, the partisan leaning of contributors to the judges or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study is not a definitive label of a justice but rather, an academic gauge of various factors.
Removal of justices
Pennsylvania does not provide statistics on dispositions in its Supreme Court.
| • PA Supreme Court deals a blow to fracking industry||Click for summary→|
|On December 19, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that certain provisions of the state's Marcellus Shale drilling law, Act 13, are unconstitutional. This decision strikes down the section of the 2012 law that allows gas companies to drill anywhere, ignoring local zoning laws. It also sent back to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court a challenge against a provision in the law that prevents doctors from informing patients of the health risks related to shale gas drilling.
In the majority of the 4-2 ruling were Chief Justice Ronald Castille, Justices Debra Todd, Seamus P. McCaffery, and Max Baer. Justices Thomas Saylor and J. Michael Eakin wrote dissenting opinions. The majority opinion stated that "several challenged provisions of Act 13 are unconstitutional," and that "the exploitation of the Marcellus Shale Formation will produce a detrimental effect on the environment, on the people, their children, and the future generations, and potentially on the public purse, perhaps rivaling the environmental effects of coal extraction."
Justice Orie Melvin removed from court
In December 2013, the Center for Public Integrity released a study on disclosure requirements for state supreme court judges. Analysts from the Center reviewed the rules governing financial disclosure in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as personal financial disclosures for the past three years. The study found that 42 states and Washington D.C. received failing grades. Pennsylvania earned a grade of D in the study. No state received a grade higher than "C". Furthermore, due in part to these lax disclosure standards, the study found 35 instances of questionable gifts, investments overlapping with caseloads and similar potential ethical quandaries. The study also noted 14 cases in which justices participated although they or their spouses held stock in the company involved in the litigation.
History of the court
The original Pennsylvania constitutions, drafted by William Penn, established a Provincial Court under the control of his British governors. The General Assembly, however, espoused the principle of separation of powers and formally called for a third branch of government starting with the 1701 Judiciary Bill. In 1722, the appointed British governor needed the House to raise revenues. House leaders agreed to raise taxes in return for an independent Supreme Court. Predating the Supreme Court of the United States by 67 years, Pennsylvania's highest court was established by the General Assembly on May 22, 1722. Interpreting the Pennsylvania Constitution, it was the first independent Supreme Court in the United States with the power to declare laws made by an elected legislative body unconstitutional. Under the 1874 Constitution until the Pennsylvania state constitution of 1968, Supreme Court justices were elected to 21 year terms. At the time, it was the longest term of any elected office in the United States.
Composition and rules
Prior to 2002, judicial candidates in Pennsylvania were prohibited from expressing their views on disputed legal or political issues. But after a similar law in Minnesota was struck down as unconstitutional (Republican Party of Minnesota v. White), the Pennsylvania rules were amended and judicial candidates may now express political viewpoints as long as they do not “commit or appear to commit the candidate with respect to cases, controversies or issues that are likely to come before the court.” (PA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 7 (B)(1)(c)).
- News: Pennsylvania Supreme Court prepares to eliminate 40 district judges, February 27, 2012
- News: Pennsylvania Supreme Court to meet in Old City Hall for the first time in over 200 years, September 12, 2011
- Pennsylvania Unified Court System page on the Supreme Court
- State of the Commonwealth's Courts, 2008
- Pennsylvania Courts, "Chief Justice Castille Explains the Supreme Court's Work and Efficiency Ethic," July 19, 2013
- About the Pennsylvania Courts
- Pennsylvania: About the Courts (timed out)
- Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System (timed out)
- Judicial Qualifications
- Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
- The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, "Research and Statistics: Caseload Statistics"
- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Pennsylvania Supreme Court declares portions of shale-drilling law unconstitutional," December 20, 2013
- What is fracking, 2013
- imbd.com, "GasLand," 2010
- rt.com, "Fracking opponents in Pennsylvania dealt rare victory by state court," December 20, 2013
- Philly.com, "What Pa. court's ruling on gas-drilling law means," December 23, 2013
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Center for Public Integrity, "State supreme court judges reveal scant financial information," December 5, 2013
- See also: Pennsylvania judicial elections, 2013
|Judge||Retention vote||Retention Vote %|
- See also: Pennsylvania judicial elections, 2011
|Candidate||Incumbency||District||Primary Vote||Election Vote|
|J. Michael Eakin||Yes||District 2, Division D||Expression error: Unexpected > operator.||Expression error: Unexpected > operator.|
|Former||Ralph Cappy • Cynthia Baldwin • Jane Greenspan • William Strong • Joan Orie Melvin • Charles Alvin Jones • Seamus P. McCaffery •|