Charles Clevert

From Judgepedia

(Redirected from Charles N. Clevert)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Charles N. Clevert, Jr. is an Article III federal judge serving in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. He was nominated to this court by President Bill Clinton on December 7, 1995

Education

A native of Richmond, Virginia, Clevert attended Davis and Elkins College, graduating with a Bachelor's Degree in 1969. He then earned his Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 1972. [1]

Legal career

After graduation from Georgetown Law, Clevert worked as an assistant District Attorney in Milwaukee County from 1972 to 1975. In 1975, Clevert joined the U.S. Attorney's Office as the Assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin from 1975-1977. In 1977, he was appointed by the U.S. Department of Justice as an Special Assistant U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois before becoming a bankruptcy court judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin later that year. Clevert also served as a lecturer at the Wisconsin Law from 1989-1990[1].

Judicial career

Clevert served as a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin from 1977-1995 and also served as the Chief judge of the Bankruptcy Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin from 1986 to 1995[1].

On recommendation from U.S. Senators Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold, Clevert was nominated by President Bill Clinton on December 7, 1995, to a seat vacated by Terence Evans as Evans was elevated to a judgeship on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Clevert was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on July 17, 1996 on a majority voice vote and receiving commission on July 29, 1996[2].

Judicial Style

It has been reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel when previewing the 2009 Milwaukee County Pension scandal trial, that Judge Clevert works long days in his court in which he can sometimes keeps juries into the night for a verdict or late testimony. Clevert is a judge who strictly favors formality in his court, and is especially intolerant of late lawyers and cell phones ringing in his courtroom. On the lighter side, Clevert has been known to also have a quick wit, making occasional humorous remarks from the bench[3].

Notable Cases

Elmbrook School District graduation

Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. Elmbrook School District

On May 28, 2009, Judge Clevert herd arguments in which the pro church and state seperation organization of Americans United for Church and State is suing the Elmbrook School District a suburban Milwaukee school district over allowing Brookfield East and Brookfield Central high schools in having their graduation ceremony held at a mega-church in Brookfield over space constraints at both Brookfield East and Brookfield Central[4].

During a three hour hearing in front of Judge Clevert, attorneys for the Washington, DC based advocacy group sued the Elmbrook School District in April on behalf of nine unnamed plaintiffs arguing that allowing Brookfield Central and East high schools to hold their graduations in the church amounted to coercing students and their guests to enter a religious facility and government establishment of religion[4].

Attorney argue that by requiring students to enter a Christian place of worship to attend their graduation ceremonies, school officials are imposing religion on students in a way even more intrusive than school prayer cases that already have been found unconstitutional[4].

Elmbrook School District's legal team defended the choice of the mega church as a spacious and convenient venue as the church capacity is 3,200, according to court documents. If Judge Clevert rules against the Elmbrook School District, the suburban Milwaukee district does not have alternative plans for graduation. Clevert said he would make a ruling before the scheduled graduation rehearsals at the church in which is scheduled during the week of June 1, 2009[4].

Alex Luchenitser who serves as senior litigation counsel for Americans United, stressed during his arguments that students and their families must spend their two-hour graduation ceremonies facing a large cross and confronted by other Christian iconography and material in the church. Mr. Luchenitser further explained: "No person should be coerced to enter a religious environment as a price for attending your own graduation"[4].

Attorneys representing the Elmbrook School District rebutted that the district's intentions of using the church was not to host graduation with the intention of promoting religion but because it is more convenient, cost-efficient and accommodating than any secular facilities in the Milwaukee area. "A reasonable person attending one of the high schools' graduation ceremonies would not think the district was promoting religion or linked to the church in any way", Elmbrook School District attorney Lori Lubinsky said[4].

"There is no dispute that this is anything but a religion-free event," Ms. Lubinsky said. "The only thing that is religious is the walls where this takes place."[4].

Judge Clevert on June 2, 2009 issued a ruling against Americans United for Seperation of Church in state ruling that the Elmbrook School District can have graduation at a church. In issuing the ruling, Judge Clevert said: "A ceremony in the church does not necessarily constitute a church ceremony"[5].

Milwaukee County pension trial

Milwaukee County v. Mercer Incorporated

Judge Clevert is the judge in the high-profile federal trial about the infamous Milwaukee County pension scandal that began on May 5, 2009.[6] Milwaukee County is suing Mercer, Inc., for over $100 million in damages. The county is suing Mercer, a consulting firm that specializes in pension benefits, for negligence and fraud for the advice that led to massive losses from the county's pension fund.

The high-stakes trial included testimony from former County Executive Thomas Ament and hinted at the possiblity that current County Executive and 2010 Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Scott Walker would be testifying[6].

Officials of the cash-strapped county at the beginning of the trial were hoping not just for a guilty verdict against Mercer, but hoping what Milwaukee County's intentions were a large, financial payoff. Backdrop payments up to the trial have soared up to $144 million, but county experts have estimated the full cost of the pension package could reach $900 million. The backdrop is a lump sum paid out at retirement on top of the monthly benefit which would set precedence in a case that could impact government employee pensions across the nation[7].

As the first week of the trial began, Judge Clevert has set the tone of the trial by making sure attorneys for both sides of the lawsuit strictly adhere to his courtroom rules. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel on May 6, 2009 noted that Milwaukee County attorney Kenneth E. McNeil inserted a bit of argument into his opening statement, counter to Clevert's courtroom protocol:[6]

"Counsel. This is an opening statement, not argument," Clevert said to the attorney representing the state's largest county tersely with the jury looking on and then give him a few minutes to wrap it up[6].

After jurors left the courtroom, Judge Clevert further admonished McNeil, saying:

"I will tell you if you go out of bounds, I will admonish you in front of the jury," the Judge Clevert said[6].

After another week of testimony including a videotaped deposition from the late Gary Dobbert who was a former personnel director who played a large part in the pension deal, on May 19, 2009 attorneys for both Milwaukee County and Mercer agreed to a settlement of $45 million damages in the case in which the county would win $32 million after paying reasonable legal fees[8].

Frank Jude trial

References

The Wisconsin Project on Judgepedia