Montana judicial elections, 2012

From Judgepedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Portal:Judicial elections
Judicial Elections
Bank 128x128.png
Elections, 2012
Judicial election dates
Find your state


The Montana judicial elections consisted of a primary on June 5th and general election on November 6th. [1] [2]

On September 17, 2012, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Montana's non-partisan election system, finding it to be unconstitutional. Political parties are now legally able to support or oppose judicial candidates in Montana. [3]


Montana judicial elections summary, 2012

  Supreme Appellate Trial
Total candidates 4   62
Unopposed candidates 0 1
Judges facing retention 1 24
Judges retained 1 24
Judges re-elected 0 1
Judges not re-elected 0 0
New judges elected 1 10
Partisan or Nonpartisan   Nonpartisan  


Supreme Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
MorrisBrian Morris   ApprovedAYesNumber 672.29%ApprovedA   ApprovedA
SheehyEd Sheehy    NoNumber 534.20%ApprovedA43.88%   DefeatedD
BestElizabeth Best    NoNumber 532% 
McKinnonLaurie McKinnon   ApprovedANoNumber 533.49%ApprovedA56.11%   ApprovedA

District Courts

Montana 1st Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
SherlockJeffrey M. Sherlock   ApprovedAYesDept. 299.24%ApprovedA84.72%   ApprovedA
MenahanMike Menahan   ApprovedANoDept. 199.30%ApprovedA100%   ApprovedA

Montana 2nd Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
NewmanBrad Newman   ApprovedAYesDept. 298.66%ApprovedA86.96%   ApprovedA
KruegerKurt Krueger   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.55%ApprovedA85.26%   ApprovedA

Montana 3rd Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
DaytonRay Dayton   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.60%ApprovedA82.63%   ApprovedA

Montana 4th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
McLeanEdward P. McLean   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.94%ApprovedA82.79%   ApprovedA
LarsonJohn W. Larson   ApprovedAYesDept. 398.75%ApprovedA82.14%   ApprovedA
DeschampsRobert Deschamps   ApprovedAYesDept. 297.84%ApprovedA76.98%   ApprovedA

Montana 5th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
TuckerLoren Tucker   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.44%ApprovedA80.20%   ApprovedA

Montana 6th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
GilbertBrenda Gilbert   ApprovedANoDept. 161.20%ApprovedA65.36%   ApprovedA
LinneweberBrett Linneweber    NoDept. 110.95% 
BeckerBruce Becker    NoDept. 17.74% 
PotenbergStephen Potenberg    NoDept. 120.04%ApprovedA34.63%   DefeatedD

Montana 7th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
SimontonRichard A. Simonton   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.55%ApprovedA83.09%   ApprovedA

Montana 8th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
PinskiGreg Pinski   ApprovedANoDept. 136.79%ApprovedA54.78%   ApprovedA
SullivanJoseph M. Sullivan    NoDept. 113.96% 
MacekJulie Macek   ApprovedAYesDept. 299.05%ApprovedA84.19%   ApprovedA
NeillKenneth R. Neill   ApprovedAYesDept. 399.38%ApprovedA87.29%   ApprovedA
RauschMichael Rausch    NoDept. 123.96% 
FagenstromSteven T. Fagenstrom    NoDept. 125.11%ApprovedA45.21%   DefeatedD

Montana 9th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
DuncanGreg W. Duncan    NoDept. 127.23% 
RiesMary Ann Dellwo Ries    NoDept. 133.17%ApprovedA44.81%   DefeatedD
OlsonRobert G. Olson   ApprovedANoDept. 139.52%ApprovedA55.18%   ApprovedA

Montana 10th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
LongBritt Long    NoDept. 114.75%ApprovedA19.41%   DefeatedD
OldenburgJon Oldenburg   ApprovedANoDept. 185.26%ApprovedA80.53%   ApprovedA

Montana 11th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
FredricksonBruce A. Fredrickson    NoDept. 219.65% 
WilsonDaniel R. Wilson    NoDept. 234.75%ApprovedA46.53%   DefeatedD
UlbrichtHeidi J. Ulbricht   ApprovedANoDept. 366.61%ApprovedA62.46%   ApprovedA
AllisonRobert B. Allison   ApprovedANoDept. 245.24%ApprovedA53.30%   ApprovedA
LympusTed O. Lympus   ApprovedAYesDept. 199%ApprovedA81.29%   ApprovedA
CeravoloVanessa Ceravolo    NoDept. 333.15%ApprovedA37.53%   DefeatedD

Montana 12th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
BoucherDan Boucher   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.24%ApprovedA81.06%   ApprovedA

Montana 13th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
GustafsonIngrid G. Gustafson   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.77%ApprovedA81.73%   ApprovedA
FaggRussell C. Fagg   ApprovedAYesDept. 298.75%ApprovedA83.25%   ApprovedA
WattersSusan P. Watters   ApprovedAYesDept. 399.10%ApprovedA84.31%   ApprovedA

Montana 14th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
SpauldingRandal I. Spaulding   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.04%ApprovedA80.94%   ApprovedA

Montana 15th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
CybulskiDavid Cybulski   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.88%ApprovedA68.12%   ApprovedA

Montana 16th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
DayGary L. Day   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.59%ApprovedA84.18%   ApprovedA
HussGeorge W. Huss   ApprovedANoDept. 250.69%ApprovedA57.41%   ApprovedA
GladeWyatt Glade    NoDept. 249.15%ApprovedA42.58%   DefeatedD

Montana 17th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
McKeonJohn C. McKeon   ApprovedAYesDept. 199.54%ApprovedA75.69%   ApprovedA

Montana 18th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
BrownHolly Brown   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.97%ApprovedA83.25%   ApprovedA
BrownJohn C. Brown   ApprovedAYesDept. 399.35%ApprovedA84.99%   ApprovedA

Montana 20th Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
ChristopherDeborah Kim Christopher   ApprovedAYesDept. 261.02%ApprovedA68.82%   ApprovedA
KraghThomas A. Kragh    NoDept. 219.88%ApprovedA31.17%   DefeatedD

Montana 22nd Judicial District Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
JonesBlair Jones   ApprovedAYesDept. 198.68%ApprovedA78.03%   ApprovedA

Justice Courts

Cascade County Justice Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
BaileyEric Bailey    NoCascade CountyN/A%39%   DefeatedD
NandlalKrishna Nandlal    NoCascade CountyN/A%11%   DefeatedD
JolleyMary Jolley   ApprovedANoCascade CountyN/A%49%   ApprovedA

Lake County Justice Court

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.
CandidateIncumbencyDepartmentPrimary VoteElection Vote
BoothAlan Booth    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
KerrDaryl Kerr    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
WeinandyDavid Weinandy    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
DeVriesDennis DeVries    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
Jonas, IIIEdwin Jonas, III    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
RaymondJames Raymond    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
JayneJoAnn Jayne   ApprovedANoLake County18%   ApprovedA
MullinsKathleen O’Rourke Mullins    NoLake CountyN/A%10%   DefeatedD
SchoeningRick Schoening    NoLake CountyN/A%17%   DefeatedD
BoyceRon Boyce    NoLake CountyN/A%Less than 10%   DefeatedD
RichardsonSharon Richardson    NoLake CountyN/A%11%   DefeatedD
KendleySteven Robert Kendley    NoLake CountyN/A%13%   DefeatedD

Ballot measure

MTflagmap.png

Proposed

The Montana Juror Prosecution Amendment (2012) was a proposed initiated constitutional amendment which did not make the ballot. It was filed by Roger Roots. The measure sought to require that "jurors be informed of their power to determine the propriety of the law to prevent unjust prosecutions."[1]

In the News

Montana election recap, 2012

In the race for Position 5 on the Montana Supreme Court, Laurie McKinnon and Ed Sheehy competed to become the successor of associate justice James Nelson who will retire at the end of this year. There was a negative ad during the campaign targeting Attorney Sheehy that labeled him as judicial activist. The ad was put up by an organization unrelated to Sheehy's opponent McKinnon, who denounced the ad after being asked to do so by Sheehy. After the November 6th results were tallied, 9th Judicial District Court Judge Laurie McKinnon was declared the winner with 53% of the vote.

In the state's trial court races all 24 judges standing for retention were retained and all incumbents re-elected. One race that made frequently made the news was the 12-way race for the Lake County Justice Court. The winner of the race was Arlee attorney JoAnn Jayne, who was accused of illegal campaigning at the polls shortly after the election. Jayne denied this allegations and as of now there has been no investigation into the matter.

Winner of 12-way race accused of illegal campaigning

As featured in JP Election Brief: Highlights of the 2012 judicial elections on November 15, 2012

Last week, JoAnn Jayne was declared the winner of a bizarre 12-way race for the Lake County Justice Court, but there have been allegations saying she engaged in illegal campaigning. Jayne has denied these accusations, saying that they “border on defamation” and that it was an attempt to “discredit the new justice of the peace.”[2]

Prosecutor Laurence Ginnings also said that he has seen no concrete evidence to support such allegations.

I’ve heard rumors, but I’ve seen no papers from the state, from the police – I have not seen anything pertinent to an investigation. If we were going to pursue it, someone would have to commence an investigation and give me some facts.[2] - Prosecutor Laurence Ginnings

At this point there has been no formal investigation into the matter.[2]

The 12-way race

Though Jayne received the majority of the vote with 18%, three others came close. The closest was Polson police officer Rick Schoening, who garnered 17% of the vote, only 149 votes behind Jayne. In third place there was former Lake County sheriff’s detective Steven Robert Kendley, who received 13% of the vote. In fourth we had the former Lake County Justice of the Peace Sharon Richardson who took 11% of the vote, failing to reclaim the seat she lost to Chuck Wall in 2002.[2] To see how the other candidates fared, see: Lake County Justice Court - 2012 Election Results

Justice of the Peace-elect JoAnn Jayne will serve on the court for the last two years of former Justice of the Peace Chuck Wall’s third term. Chuck Wall resigned earlier this year following the settlement of sexual harassment lawsuits filed against him by two court staff member. [3]

Citing State Code of Conduct, Supreme Court candidate asks opponent to denounce attack ad

As featured in JP Election Brief: Attack ads and voter education on October 25, 2012.

Montana Supreme Court Candidate Ed Sheehy of Missoula is being attacked by a pro-business group which labels him as a judicial activist seeking to abolish the death penalty. Part of a radio ad by the non-profit group Montana Growth Network uses a one of Sheehy's former cases as evidence of his alleged activism. In the case, Sheehy's client sought to avoid the death penalty by declaring it unconstitutional.[4]

It was a slap in the face for victims’ families and justice. Now Ed Sheehy wants to take his activist values to the Montana Supreme Court. - Montana Growth Network Radio ad[4]

Attorney Sheehy denied these claims of activism and defended himself saying, “I did my job representing my client. I have to raise any legal issue I can raise.” Sheehy also noted that his views on the death penalty are irrelevant, because as a Supreme Court Justice he would not preside over death penalty cases due to the cases he has worked on as an attorney.[4]

Sheehy has asked his opponent Laurie McKinnon to denounce the attack ad, citing Montana Code of Conduct which says, "...when a third party lies or makes false statements about a candidate, the other candidate should disavow the ad and ask them to cease and desist."[4] McKinnon, however, claims she has not heard the ad and that such a request is unreasonable in the middle of a heated campaign.

McKinnon and Sheehy will face off next month in the November 6th election.

Update

October 31, 2012: Last week, Judge Laurie McKinnon issued a press release denouncing the negative ad that targeted her opponent Ed Sheehy.

Negative advertising has no place in a nonpartisan race. I disavow any attempts to paint any candidate in a negative light. Mudslinging diminishes the prestige of our highest court. I ask for your vote based on who I am, not on negative portrayals of my opponent.[5] - Laurie McKinnon

Montana Supreme Court race

As featured in JP Election Brief: The Supreme Court Special on October 18, 2012.

In Montana, judges have been chosen in nonpartisan elections since 1935; state law makes it illegal for any political party to "endorse, contribute to, or make an expenditure to support or oppose a judicial candidate." However, a recent federal appeals court ruling could change all that. Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the prohibition of endorsements by political parties is unconstitutional and should be lifted immediately. Unless the state successfully appeals this ruling, it appears that Montana will have partisan judicial elections for the first time in 77 years.[6] This could certainly change the outcome of the race between McKinnon and Sheehy, competing for a vacant seat on the Montana Supreme Court. Additionally, an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court could have ramifications across all states that choose their judges via nonpartisan elections.

Candidate's views

The race for the Montana Supreme Court is probably one of the most significant races Montana voters have to decide, however, unlike the other statewide races, it is difficult to get the general public interested in a judicial election even though the person elected will serve an eight-year term on a very important branch of our government. The Montana Supreme Court is the court of last resort for every person in Montana to have a chance to obtain justice. I am running for the Court because I believe in the law and that everyone has the right to justice and that justice, in the end, is what’s fair, what’s right, and what’s just.[7]
-Ed Sheehy

Montana's nonpartisan elections struck down

As featured in JP Election Brief: Race mix-ups and a pledge of peace on October 11, 2012.

Montana's nonpartisan system of elections, which has been in place since the 1930's, was declared unconstitutional last month by a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. The ruling removed the state's ban on political endorsements for judicial candidates, citing the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, of the Southern District of New York, explained that, in light of Citizens United, the political speech of corporations could not be limited any more than that of individuals. He wrote,

"The voters of Montana are thus deprived of the full and robust exchange of views to which, under our Constitution, they are entitled."[8]

Prior to the ruling, Montana law did not allow political parties to "endorse, contribute to, or make an expenditure to support or oppose a judicial candidate."[8] An appeal is still possible, though political parties are now free to endorse judicial candidates for the upcoming election.

Judge Rakoff and Judge Ronald Gould made up the majority opinion, while Judge Mary Schroeder dissented. In her dissent, Schroeder argued that,

"Political endorsements, much more than judges’ discussion of issues, lead to political indebtedness, which in turn has a corrosive impact on the public’s perception of the judicial system."[8]

The case was: Sanders County Republican Central Committee v Bullock.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Montana's limits on corporate political spending, extending Citizens United to the state level.[9]

Judicial campaigns target TV, spending 4.6 million and counting

As featured in JP Election Brief: Money and controversies on September 27, 2012.

Candidate spending is on the rise in Alabama, Illinois, Texas, West Virginia, Arkansas, Montana and Oregon. According to data compiled by Justice at Stake and the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, candidates from the seven states spent a combined total of $4,673,370 on primary television ads.[10] That figure is more than quadruple the estimated amount spent on television ads during the 2010 primaries. This year's primary spending also surpassed 2004's record of $3.8 million, which included nine states.[11][12]

The two organizations who compiled the data are trying to show the effects of special interest groups on judicial elections.

Money and special interests continue to transform judicial elections around the country.[11] - Alicia Bannon[13]

The candidates

The following is a selection of the highest-spending candidates.[14]

Alabama

Illinois

Texas

West Virginia

Arkansas

Montana

Oregon

The Brennan Center for Justice is a "'non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice'".[12] Justice at Stake is a non-partisan nonprofit "working to keep America's courts fair and impartial."[12]

Montana Supreme Court race heats up

As featured in JP Election Brief: All about appellate courts on May 24, 2012.

With Montana's judicial primary around the corner, candidates are battling for votes. Candidate Ed Sheehy has accused fellow candidate Elizabeth Best of violating the Montana Code of Judicial Conduct by including endorsements from current officeholders on her campaign website. Best responded by removing the endorsements and saying their addition to the website was unintentional. Sheehy also criticized candidate Laurie McKinnon for using a letter from District Judge Nels Swandal, which endorsed her and solicited contributions.[16]

“Judge McKinnon was required to take reasonable measures to not allow this to occur. With this activity by her or her campaign staff, it cannot be said that she is honoring the judiciary as a public trust or maintaining, enhancing, or striving to maintain confidence in our legal system.”[16] -Ed Sheehy

Best and Sheehy were criticized in a mailer, paid for by Montana Growth Network Inc. Best was accused of filing a environmentalist lawsuit which would, "seize control of the state’s atmosphere." Sheehy was referenced for his involvement in the "Christmas Day Killer Lawsuit." He dismissed the mailer as false and misleading.

Montana

The candidates:

  • Elizabeth Best is an attorney at Best Law Firm in Great Falls, Montana. She served as in the Judge Advocate General's Corps in the United States Army from 1981 to 1984. Best holds a B.A. in Political Science from Montana State University and a J.D. from the University of Montana School of Law in 1981. [17] Best has emphasized her high peer rating and endorsements from former and current justices. She has also been appointed to serve the Montana Supreme Court commissions on civil procedure and evidence, and the Montana Federal Court Local Rules Committee.[16]
  • Laurie McKinnon is a judge for the 9th District Court in Montana. Before taking her current position on the 9th District she worked as a deputy attorney in Teton County. McKinnon holds a Bachelor’s degree from Goucher College in Towson, Md in 1982 and a J.D. from the University of Baltimore School of Law in 1986. She is currently pursuing a master’s and doctorate in Judicial Studies at the University of Nevada and the National Judicial College in Reno. McKinnon is the only judge running in this three way race. In a reference to the experience of her fellow candidates she said, “As a judge, I do not get the luxury of specializing in a particular area of the law, like my opponents.”[16]
  • Ed Sheehy is an attorney with Office of the State Public Defender, a position he has held since 2006. Previously he served as a regional defender in Missoula. He worked as an attorney and partner for 27 years at Cannon and Sheehy in Helena. In 1978 he clerked for then-Montana Chief Justice Frank I. Haswell. Sheehy holds a Bachelor’s in Political Science from Carroll College in 1974 and a J.D. from Gonzaga Law School in 1977.[16]

The two candidates with the most votes in the June 5th primary will move on to the November 6th election.

1st District Court race

As featured in JP Election Brief: Candidates filing in Michigan, Kentucky, Washington and more! on May 3, 2012.

The upcoming June 5th primary will begin the first contested district court race Cascade County has seen in a decade. With the upcoming retirement of Judge Thomas M. McKittrick there will be an open seat on the 8th Judicial District Court. Running for this seat are three attorneys and a justice of the peace who will face off in the June 5th primary. After the primary only two of these candidates will advance to the general election on November 6th.[18]

The following candidates are competing for the seat currently held by Thomas M. McKittrick:

  • Greg Pinski is currently an attorney with the firm of Conner & Pinski, PLLP. He earned his Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude in Political Science and Journalism from the University of North Dakota in 1996 and his Juris Doctor, with distinction, from the University of North Dakota School of Law in 1999.[18]
  • Michael Rausch is a partner with the firm Smith, Walsh, Clarke, and Gregoire, PLLP. He earned his bachelor of arts in Business and French from Concordia College in 1991 and his law degree from the University of Montana in 1994. [18]
  • Joseph M. Sullivan is an attorney in private practice. He earned his bachelor of science in Mathematics (Honors), from Gonzaga University in 1981 and his J.D. from Gonzaga University School of Law in 1985. [18]

Races set for Montana primary

As featured in JP Election Brief: Heading south with news from Louisiana, Alabama, Florida and Texas on March 15, 2012.

Monday was the filing deadline for the primary election in Montana. Voters will pick two Montana Supreme Court justices this year, one open seat and one incumbent running.

For Seat Number 5, three candidates will compete to succeed James Nelson. Laurie McKinnon is the only judge who filed, and attorneys Ed Sheehy and Elizabeth Best will face off on June 5, 2012. The two candidates who receive the most votes will advance to the general election. Since only two candidates have filed for Number 6, they will only compete on November 6. This is the seat of Justice Brian Morris, who is seeking his second term on the court. He is challenged by Hertha L. Lund, an attorney from Bozeman. [21]

In addition to the Supreme Court, there are thirty-two District Court races in Montana this year. To see a full list of candidates, visit: Montana Secretary of State, Non-legislative Primary Candidates.

See also

External links

References

  1. Montana Secretary of State, "Constitutional Initiative No. 107 (CI-107)", Retrieved June 22, 2011
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 The Missoulian, "Lake County JP winner denies accusations of illegal campaigning," November 08, 2012
  3. The Daily Inter Lake, "Lake County interim judge selected," August 25, 2012
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 The Missoulian, "Pro-business group's ad attacks Montana Supreme Court candidate on death penalty," October 16, 2012
  5. The Missoulian, "Montana Supreme Court candidate disavows negative ads," October 31, 2012
  6. Huffington Post, "Montana nonpartisan judicial elections system struck down by Appeals Court," September 18, 2012
  7. Information submitted to Judgepedia by Sheehy's campaign via email on 10/8/2012
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Huffington Post, "Montana Nonpartisan Judicial Elections System Struck Down By Appeals Court", September 18, 2012
  9. Huffington Post, "Supreme Court Reverses Anti-Citizens United Ruling From Montana", June 27, 2012
  10. This total does not include spending for the general election or other campaign spending.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Legal Newsline, "Report: Judicial candidates spent more than $4.6M in primary TV ads," September 14, 2012
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 The West Virginia Record, "Report: W.Va. judicial candidates spent nearly $600,000 in primary TV ads," September 18, 2012
  13. A counsel in the Brennan Center's Democracy Program
  14. The list is not exhaustive, it only includes the highest-spending candidates.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 Justice at Stake, "Campaign Money Patterns Entering New Phase in 2012 Judicial Races," September 13, 2012
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Helen Air, "Montana Supreme Court candidates trade shots," May 18, 2012
  17. Per information submitted to Judgepedia on a Candidate Information form
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Greatfalls Tribune, "Judge candidates bring wealth of experience to race," Apr. 28, 2012
  19. Cascade County Justice Court web page
  20. Martindale.com, "Judge Profile:Steven Thor Fagenstrom"
  21. Montana Secretary of State, Non-legislative Primary Candidates
MontanaMontana Supreme CourtMontana District CourtsMontana Courts of Limited JurisdictionMontana Water CourtMontana Workers' Compensation CourtUnited States District Court for the District of MontanaUnited States bankruptcy court, District of MontanaUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMontana countiesMontana judicial newsMontana judicial electionsJudicial selection in MontanaMontanaTemplate.jpg
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Encyclopedia:
Get involved:
Donate
Toolbox