Note: Judgepedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 9 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
Starting on March 9, all Judgepedia content will be contained on Ballotpedia.org. For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.

North Carolina voters polled about judicial campaign contributions

From Judgepedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Judicial Update

February 23, 2011

North Carolina: Yesterday, a poll was released which showed that voters in North Carolina are supportive of the state's public financing for judicial campaigns. It also found that a large percentage of voters believe campaign contributions to judges affect those involved in a case.[1]

The poll was conducted by the Justice at Stake Campaign, a nonpartisan group, and North Carolina Center for Voter Education, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, earlier this month.[1]

48% of respondents answered that they believe public financing for judicial campaigns reduces corruption. Also, 85% believe that a judge should always recuse herself or himself if a campaign contributor is involved in a case before that judge. Correspondingly, 94% of those surveyed think that campaign contributions have some affect on a judge's later ruling, although that ranges from influencing "Greatly" to "Only a Small Amount."[2]

To read the full survey with results, click here.

References