Roger Gregory

From Judgepedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Roger Gregory
Placeholder image.png
Do you have a photo that could go here? Submit it for this profile by emailing us!
Current Court Information:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Title:   Judge
Appointed by:   Bill Clinton
Approval vote:   93-1-6
Active:   7/25/2001 - Present
Preceded by:   New Seat
Personal History
Born:   1953
Hometown:   Philadelphia, PA
Undergraduate:   Virginia State U. '75
Law School:   U. of Michigan Law '78

Roger L. Gregory (b. 1953) is a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He joined the court in 2001 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton.

Early life and education

A native Pennsylvanian, Gregory graduated from Virginia State University with his bachelor's degree in 1975, and later graduated from Michigan Law with his Juris Doctor degree in 1978.[1]

Professional career

Gregory spent his entire pre-judicial legal career as a private practice attorney licensed in the State of Michigan from 1978 to 1980, and in the Commonwealth of Virginia from 1980 to 2000.[1]

Pathways to the bench

Judge Gregory was featured in the U.S. Courts "Pathways to the Bench" education program.

Judicial career

Fourth Circuit

Gregory received a recess appointment from President Bill Clinton on December 27, 2000, to a new seat created by 104 Stat. 5089, which was approved by Congress. Gregory was re-nominated by President George W. Bush on May 9, 2001. Gregory was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on July 20, 2001, on a super majority 93-1-6 vote, and received commission on July 25, 2001.[2]

Notable cases

Corrupt sheriff not entitled to qualified immunity (2013)

  United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
     *Durham v. Jones, et al 12-2303
On December 10, 2013, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit, composed of Judges Diana Motz, Roger Gregory, and Senior Judge Andre Davis, found that a Maryland Sheriff Robert Jones, who fired a deputy in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights, was not entitled to qualified immunity, and must answer to the $1.1 million jury award established in the federal district trial court.[3]

In the underlying case, James Durham, a deputy sheriff, used physical force and pepper spray in self defense to detain a man attempting to flee from police. Durham was later aggressively interrogated about and pressured to falsify his report by superiors. Durham later did so, but then filed an internal grievance about the incident, only to be demoted. Durham then went to the media to expose the sheriff's office for its unjust behavior. Durham was then fired for "disseminating departmental information," a form of misconduct. He filed suit, and a jury at a federal trial found Jones guilty of retaliation after he fired Durham for exercising a constitutional right, awarding the deputy sheriff $1.1 million in damages.[3]

Jones appealed with claims he should have been granted immunity against the charges, but Judge Davis, writing for the majority, affirmed, stating:[3]

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Serious, to say nothing of corrupt, law enforcement misconduct is a substantial concern that must be met with a similarly substantial disruption in the calibration of the controlling balancing test. Given Jones' inability to show at trial how Durham's actions had an adverse impact on the proper functioning of the [Somerset County, Maryland, Sheriff’s Office] in some serious manner, the balance between Durham's rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment and Jones' interest in ensuring an efficient and effective work environment tilts heavily in favor of Durham and his entitlement to enjoy protected speech.[3]
Since it is clearly established that an employee's speech about governmental misconduct is constitutionally protected, Jones was not entitled to immunity, and must pay the damages awarded to Durham at the federal jury trial.[3]

See also

External links


Federal judicial offices
Preceded by:
NA - new seat
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Succeeded by: