Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

From Judgepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Court information
Justices:   5
Judicial selection
Method:   Partisan election of judges
Term:   12 years
Active justices

Robin Jean Davis  •  Margaret Workman  •  Brent Benjamin  •  Menis Ketchum  •  Thomas E. McHugh  •  

Former justices

Contents

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is the highest court in West Virginia. Although the West Virginia Constitution allows for an intermediate court of appeals to be created, the Supreme Court currently provides the only appellate review of the decisions of lower trial courts (called "circuit courts").

The courthouse is located in the state capital, Charleston, West Virginia.

Justices

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has five justices who are elected by the voters in partisan elections to 12-year terms. A replacement may be appointed by the Governor in the case of a mid-term court vacancy. In the case of temporary inability of a justice to serve the court, the chief justice may assign a Circuit Court judge to serve in their stead.

A retired justice or judge may apply for senior status to serve on temporary assignment as a justice of the supreme court of appeals, pending approval by the supreme court of appeals. [1]

The West Virginia Supreme Court has 5 justices.
JudgeTermAppointed byParty
Chief Justice Robin Jean Davis1996 - 2012Democratic
Justice Margaret Workman2008 - presentDemocrat
Justice Brent Benjamin2004 - presentRepublican
Justice Menis Ketchum2008 - presentDemocrat
Justice Thomas E. McHugh2008 - 2012Democrat

Chief justice

The Chief Justice position rotates among the justices each year.[1] Robin Jean Davis is the 2010 chief justice. [2] The 2009 chief justice was Brent Benjamin. [3]

2012 election

Candidates are competing for two seats.

The following is a list of candidates for the 2012 Supreme Court election:
CandidateIncumbencyPartyPrimary VoteElection Vote
PalmerLouis Palmer   NoDemocratic6% 
RogersH. John Rogers   NoDemocratic9% 
BeaneJ.D. Beane   NoDemocratic11% 
RoweJames J. Rowe   NoDemocratic20% 
ChafinLetitia Chafin   NoDemocratic27%Approveda   
DavisRobin Jean Davis   YesDemocratic28%Approveda   
LougryAllen Loughry   NoRepublican   
YoderJohn Yoder   NoRepublican   

Jurisdiction

The court has original jurisdiction on matters of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and certiorari. The court also interprets the law and the constitution.[1]

Judicial selection

Each of the five justices on the Supreme Court of Appeals in West Virginia serves terms of 12 years. In the case of a vacancy, the Governor of the state appoints the justice. That appointed justice must then run in the next general election.[2]

Qualifications

Justices must have practiced law for at least 10 years.[3]

Removal of justices

Caseloads

Year Total filings Total dispositions
2010 1,668 2,782
2009 1,917 3,589
2008 2,411 4,102
2007 3,954 2,532
2006 3,544 2,721
2005 2,983 2,396

[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Schedule of the court

There are two terms of the Court each year. The first term begins on the second Tuesday in January and ends in July. The second term begins on the first Wednesday in September and ends in December. The time period between terms is called "sine die," which is Latin for "without day." When the Court is in session, the justices hear cases and deliver opinions. At other times, the justices consider the emergency business that comes before the Court. In addition to its judicial functions, the Supreme Court of Appeals has administrative and regulatory responsibilities. The Court has adopted a Code of Judicial Conduct, Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law, Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules of Judicial Disciplinary Procedure and Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure.[10]

Salaries

Yearly salary for both the associate justices and the Chief Justice is $121,000 as of January 2009.[11][12]

Notable decisions

History of the court

U.S. Supreme Court asked to intervene

The New York Times reported in October of 2008 that the nation's court of last resort will potentially hear three cases dealing with businesses and their right to appeal, as well as influence over, the West Virginia Supreme Court. One of the cases involves current Justice Benjamin's refusal to recuse himself from a pending case before the West Virginia bench in which one of Benjamin's past campaign contributors (more than $3 million) is involved; at issue is due process. Benjamin has "twice joined a 3-to-2 majority throwing out a $50 million verdict against the company," the paper reported. The case (Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Company No. 08-22) has accrued supporting briefs from the American Bar Association and the Brennan Center for Justice. The contributor has filed briefs asking that the Supreme Court not hear the case, calling it “a grand conspiracy theory," and further commenting that the United States Supreme Court “has never adopted a ‘looks bad’ due process test.”

The second appeal, Massey Energy v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (No. 08-218), also revolves around Massey Energy's influence over the court; Massey briefs claim that statements made by sitting Justice Larry Starcher against the energy company require Starcher's recusal from the case in question. Massey takes a different position in a second appeal to the United States Supreme Court, this one urging the court to disqualify Justice Starcher, he of the intemperate remarks. “There would be no inconsistency” in granting that appeal while turning back the one concerning Justice Benjamin, a Massey brief said, because Justice Starcher’s bias was manifest while Justice Benjamin’s conflict of interest, if there was one, was a question of appearances only.

In a classic "I'll do it if you do" move, Starcher has said he'll recuse himself only if Benjamin recuses himself from Caperton. At issue in the third appeal is whether or not companies hit with massive punitive damages lawsuits have a right to appeal to the state supreme court. Currently, West Virginia "[does] not guarantee at least one level of appellate review in civil cases." It is one of two states, Virginia being the other, that does not guarantee appellate reviews.[13]

Legal study

In a Metro News op-ed titled "We can figure this out," lawyers for the Peyton Law Firm advocate commissioning a disinterested firm to study how West Virginia could improve its judicial system. The editorial bemoans the two great factions influencing judicial operations--the plaintiffs' bar and big business--as well as the lack of appeals courts. Using the 2008 West Virginia Supreme Court election for the backdrop, the editorial criticizes the recent move by two special interest groups to attempt to convince federal judges to throw out election laws in order to attack candidates with anonymity. It goes on to assert this year's election will do little to change the fact that "Ideology has largely replaced qualifications as a defining characteristic for court candidates."[14]

Notable firsts

External links

References

Portions of this article have been taken from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Copyright Notice can be found here.

This State Supreme Courts and Justices article does not have an image.

West VirginiaSupreme Court of Appeals of West VirginiaWest Virginia Circuit CourtsWest Virginia Family CourtsWest Virginia Magistrate CourtsWest Virginia Municipal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of West VirginiaUnited States District Court for the Southern District of West VirginiaUnited States bankruptcy court, Northern District of West VirginiaUnited States bankruptcy court, Southern District of West VirginiaUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitWest Virginia countiesWest Virginia judicial newsWest Virginia judicial electionsJudicial selection in West Virginia
Personal tools