User talk:Michaeltams

From Judgepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Hi Michaeltams. If you go to User:Dlopez/links not found you will find the changes that need to be made on courts in Montana-NJ. Dlopez 14:22, 29 January 2009 (CST)


Hi Mike. I wanted to make sure you saw these articles:

I'm not a sysops. If I were, I would add Judgepedia:Fix or report an error to the MediaWiki:Sidebar somewhere. Note the new sidebar on http://www.ballotpedia.org.

Same note left on Crystal and Matt's talk pages.

Leslie 22:00, 15 March 2008 (CDT)

Mary Mullarkey

Hi Michael, thanks for that edit. I've included the footnote for that quote, and placed it above the blockquote in the introduction to the quote.

SethCooper

Thanks for the note, Michael. I plan on adding several more on the WA Supreme Court over the next 2 months.

web page access

Hi Mike,

I'd like to update the pages on Alabama, Louisiana, and Nevada as the night continues with the election results, as well as contribute to any talk. Is there any way I can do that as it is locked right now?

State supreme court templates

Note: Judgepedia:Horizontal navigational templates

This template:

allows you to quickly click through each template, and consequently into the article for each state supreme court justice, to see which articles need updating, expansion or, in some cases, creation. It looks like there are about 3-4 new state supreme court justices without an article. Many but not all of the approximately 330 articles about state supreme court justices have been updated to reflect the consensus style guidelines which are described here.

TOC Nest Right

Mike:

I have been using a long hand version to move the TOC to the right, but I think the new shorthand one you send me may work better.

Michigan

Hi Mike,

I totally agree--I just moved the two sections above the history section. Thanks! Anne

Suspected Copyvio @ Iowa Supreme Court

Significant portions of the Iowa Supreme Court article appear to be copyvio from [1], [2], and possibly from similar pages as well. (Additonally, the information was not attributed to the source - though I suspect the copyvio was merely the contributor forgetting that publications of a state government as opposed to a federal government aren't automatically copyright-free.) Normally I'd just remove the copyvio myself, but since the contributor - User:Atragsdale appears to be fairly prolific on Judgepedia, I thought I'd report it to a "regular" here, as his other contributions may be suspect as well. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:10, 24 February 2009 (CST)

Sorry for pointing this out as a stranger, btw, but I noticed the article was more in-depth than Wikipedia's version and was checking sources before transwiki'ing when I noticed the problem. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:13, 24 February 2009 (CST)