Illinois Supreme Court
|Illinois Supreme Court|
|Method:||Partisan election of judges|
JusticesThe current justices of the court are:
|Justice Robert Thomas||2000-2020||Republican|
|Justice Lloyd Karmeier||2004-12/1/2024||Republican|
|Justice Charles Freeman||1990-2020||Democratic|
|Chief Justice Rita Garman||2001-2022||Republican|
|Justice Thomas Kilbride||2000-2020||Democratic|
|Justice Mary Jane Theis||2010-2022||Democratic|
|Justice Anne M. Burke||2006-2018||Democratic|
The court has limited original jurisdiction, hears appeals of right in death penalty cases and cases where the constitutionality of laws has been called into question, and has a docket of discretionary appeal from the Illinois Appellate Court. Along with the state legislature, the court promulgates court rules for the state as a whole. The Supreme Court has general administrative and supervisory authority over all courts in the state. This authority is exercised by the Chief Justice with the assistance of the Administrative Director and staff appointed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court hears appeals from lower courts and may exercise original jurisdiction in cases relating to revenue, mandamus, prohibition or habeas corpus. Also, its members have the authority to appoint trial judges to the appellate court on a temporary basis.
- Main article: Illinois Supreme Court elections
Justices on the court run for ten-year terms in partisan elections. Each justice represents one of the five Supreme Court judicial districts in Illinois; the First District which consists of Cook County and Chicago, elects three of the justices; the remaining four choose one each. To be re-elected, the justice must run in an uncontested, non-partisan retention election, whereby the justice must win at least 60% of the vote to be retained. After an appointment, the justice must run for a full term at the next general election in a partisan election that is more than 60 days after the appointment. The current political landscape of the Supreme Court of Illinois consists of four justices elected on the Democratic ticket, and three justices elected on the Republican ticket.
In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan outlook of state supreme court justices in their paper, State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns. A score above 0 indicated a more conservative leaning ideology while scores below 0 were more liberal. The state Supreme Court of Illinois was given a Campaign finance score (CFscore) which was calculated for judges in October 2012. At that time, Illinois received a score of -0.31. Based on the justices selected, Illinois was the 15th most liberal court. The study is based on data from campaign contributions by judges themselves, the partisan leaning of contributors to the judges or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study is not a definitive label of a justice but rather, an academic gauge of various factors.
To be considered eligible to be a Judge or Associate Judge, a person must be a United States citizen, a license attorney of Illinois, and a resident of the district which selects the Judge. Additionally, "No change in the boundaries of a unit shall affect the tenure in office of a Judge or Associate Judge incumbent at the time of such change."
Removal of justices
"Illinois judges may be removed in one of two ways:
- The judicial inquiry board files complaints with the courts commission. After notice and hearing, the commission may reprimand, censure, suspend, retire, or remove a judge.
- Judges may be impeached by a majority vote of the house of representatives and removed by a two-thirds vote of the senate."
In December 2008, three citizens filed suit in the Supreme Court in the case Bambenek et al v. Milorad R. Blagojevich concerning the ability of Governor Rod Blagojevich to continue serving in office after his arrest on corruption charges. The Court is asked to consider ruling Blagojevich unfit to serve pursuant to the "other disability" clause of the Illinois Constitution, Article V, Section 6(b). The full name of the case is "John C. Bambenek, Adam Andrzejewski, and John Tillman, citizens of the state of Illinois v. Milorad R. Blagojevich, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois." The text of the brief can be viewed here. On December 17, 2008, the Supreme Court denied, without comment, hearing this suit as well as an identical suit filed by Attorney General Lisa Madigan.
Certification of Burris appointment
The appointment of United States Senator-Designee Roland Burris is making its way to the Illinois Supreme Court. The case seeks to compel Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White to sign the certification papers of Roland Burris to the U.S. Senate. U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, during a January 7, 2009 press conference, cited a Senate rule dating back to the 1800's that requires both the certification of the Governor and Secretary of State.
On Janauary 9, 2009 the Illinois Supreme Court voted unanimously to refuse to compel Secretary of State Jesse White of Illinois to sign the document that would make his Senate Appointment official pursuant to rules of the United States Senate.
In issuing the ruling, Illinois Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier said White's signature was not needed for Burris to be seated in the Senate.
"We note ... that nothing in the published rules of the Senate, including Rule II, appears to require that Senate appointments made by state executives pursuant to the 17th Amendment must be signed and sealed by the state's secretary of state. Moreover, no explanation has been given as to how any rule of the Senate, whether it be formal or merely a matter of tradition, could supersede the authority to fill vacancies conferred on the states by the federal constitution. Under these circumstances, the Senate's actions cannot serve as the predicate for a mandamus action against the secretary of state. The only issue before us is whether the secretary of state, an official of this state, failed to perform an act required of him by the law of Illinois. He did not." 
Despite the ruling of the Illinois Supreme Court, it would still be of the discretion of the United States Senate to determine if Burris the former Attorney General of Illinois would be seated as the junior senator for the State of Illinois.
In December 2013, the Center for Public Integrity released a study on disclosure requirements for state supreme court judges. Analysts from the Center reviewed the rules governing financial disclosure in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as personal financial disclosures for the past three years. The study found that 42 states and Washington D.C. received failing grades. Illinois earned a grade of D in the study. No state received a grade higher than "C". Furthermore, due in part to these lax disclosure standards, the study found 35 instances of questionable gifts, investments overlapping with caseloads and similar potential ethical quandaries. The study also noted 14 cases in which justices participated although they or their spouses held stock in the company involved in the litigation.
History of the court
The court was founded in 1818 in Article IV of the Illinois Constitution. The court's authority is granted in Article VI of the current Illinois Constitution, which provides for seven justices elected from the five appellate judicial districts of the state. The district encompassing Cook County is represented by three justices, while the other four districts elect one each. Each justice is elected for a term of ten years and the chief justice is elected by the court from its members for a three-year term.
On December 3, 1818, President Monroe signed legislature to allow Illinois to enter the Union as a state. Article IV of the Illinois constitution provides for the judicial system in the state. The court had appellate jurisdiction in all cases other than cases involving revenue, mandamus, habeas corpus and impeachment. In these cases the Supreme Court had original jurisdiction. Judges were to be appointed by the General Assembly. In 1841, after being legislated in and out of existence, all circuits were dissolved with legislation. To uphold the caseload, five new Supreme Court justices were appointed to augment the court. This system remained until 1848 when the second Illinois Constitution was adopted.
The Constitution of 1848
In 1848, the Illinois Constitution was amended, and Article V established a Supreme Court with only three judges. The court convened only one time annually in each division. The judges were elected for nine-year terms by popular vote, and represented each of the three divisions of the state. This Supreme Court had original jurisdiction in cases of revenue, mandamus, habeas corpus, and impeachment, and appellate jurisdiction in all other cases. Nine circuits were established with the amended constitution, with one judge per circuit.
Constitution of 1870
The constitution of 1870 provided seven judges with seven districts for the Supreme Court, and maintained jurisdiction as previously enumerated. The term of office was nine years. "It was to hold annual terms in each of the three grand divisions established by the 1848 Constitution, and one or more terms at Chicago, if suitable quarters were provided. Four judges constituted a quorum and the concurrence of four was necessary for a decision. Districts could be changed by law to maintain equality in population, but must be composed of contiguous counties." The Constitution of 1870 remained until adoption of the 1970 Constitution.
Constitution of 1970
The Judicial Article (Article VI) of the 1970 Constitution decreased the Supreme Court's mandatory appellate jurisdiction. Appeals from the circuit courts were directed to the Supreme Court only when considering the death sentence. Appeals from the Appellate Court to the Supreme Court were made in only two instances. The first, if a constitutional question is presented as a result of an action of the Appellate Court. The other is if the Appellate Court itself determines that the case should be determined by the Supreme Court. The 1970 Constitution increased the supervisory and administrative authority of the Supreme Court, as well.
The court's chief justice is elected by the court from its members for a three-year term.
Previous chief justices were:
In the years since the convention of 1970, there have been multiple attempts to reform the court, and specifically to change the method of judicial selection. Proponents have included the Illinois State Bar Association, the Chicago Bar Association and the League of Women Voters of Illinois. None of these efforts were successful.
Reappointments in Cook County
The Supreme Court has been found to be using its recall power to put a number of Cook County Circuit Court judges back in office, contrary to voters' decisions at the polls. A review by the Chicago Tribune found that, since 2000, the Supreme Court had reappointed 18 judges to the Cook County Circuit Court who had been ousted by voters. Some say that this practice, which has gone on for a long time, violates the will of the voters. In 1993, the court promised to stop. In August of 2011, a court spokesman said that the justices decided to end the practice months ago, though critics are still skeptical.
- The Illinois Supreme Court: Judicial Activism, With Limits
- Fringe Tactics: Special Interest Groups Target Judicial Races
- Illinois Supreme Court Official Site
- List of Supreme Court Justices from Supreme Court's website
- Supreme and Appellate Court District Map
- Illinois General Assembly; Courts: (705 ILCS 25/) Appellate Court Act
- Constitution of the State of Illinois, Article VI: The Judiciary
- American Judicature Society: Judicial selection in the states: Illinois
- Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
- Illinois Constitution
- Methods of Selection: Removal of Judges
- Illinois Courts, "Supreme Court Caseload Statistics"
- Court denies suit, Chicago Tribune
- "WGN-TV 9", Democrats leave Door Ajar for Burris, January 7, 2009
- "Chicago Tribune" Supreme Court Rules Against Burris, January 9, 2009
- Center for Public Integrity, "State supreme court judges reveal scant financial information," December 5, 2013
- "A History of the Illinois Judicial System", prepared by the Illinois Supreme Court Library
- American Judicature Society: History of Efforts to Reform the Illinois Judiciary
- Chicago Tribune, "State high court overrules voters on judge picks", August 26, 2011
|Candidate||Incumbency||Party||Predecessor||Primary Vote||Election Vote|
|Aurelia Marie Pucinski||No||Democratic||Vacancy of Thomas Fitzgerald||21%|
|James G. Riley||No||Republican||Vacancy of Thomas Fitzgerald||25.3%|
|Joy Cunningham||No||Democratic||Vacancy of Thomas Fitzgerald||23%|
|Mary Jane Theis||Yes||Democratic||Vacancy of Thomas Fitzgerald||48%||74.7%|
|Rita Garman||Yes||Republican||Expression error: Unexpected > operator.|
|Thomas W. Flannigan||No||Democratic||Vacancy of Thomas Fitzgerald||7%|
- See also: 2010 State Supreme Court elections
| Illinois Supreme Court |
2010 General election results
|Charles Freeman (D)||n/a||78%|
| Illinois Supreme Court |
2010 General election results
|Robert Thomas (R)||n/a||81%|
| Illinois Supreme Court |
2010 General election results
- See also: State Supreme Court elections, 2008
Anne M. Burke was retained in the 2008 election.
| Illinois Supreme Court |
2008 General election results
|Anne M. Burke (D)||n/a||n/a|
|Former||Mary Ann McMorrow • Thomas R. Fitzgerald (Illinois) •|