Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Court information
Justices:	5
Judicial selection
Method:	Partisan election of judges
Term:	12 years
Active justices
Robin Jean Davis  •  Margaret Workman  •  Brent Benjamin  •  Menis Ketchum  •  Allen Loughry  •
Former justices

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is the highest court in West Virginia. Although the West Virginia Constitution allows for an intermediate court of appeals to be created, the Supreme Court currently provides the only appellate review of the decisions of lower trial courts (called "circuit courts").

The courthouse is located in the state capital, Charleston, West Virginia.

Justices

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has five justices who are elected by the voters in partisan elections to 12-year terms. A replacement may be appointed by the Governor in the case of a mid-term court vacancy. In the case of temporary inability of a justice to serve the court, the chief justice may assign a Circuit Court judge to serve in their stead.

A retired justice or judge may apply for senior status to serve on temporary assignment as a justice of the supreme court of appeals, pending approval by the supreme court of appeals.

The current justices of the court are:

Judge	Term	Appointed by	Party
Justice Robin Jean Davis	1996-2024		Democratic
Justice Margaret Workman	2008-present		Democratic
Chief Justice Brent Benjamin	2004-2016		Republican
Justice Menis Ketchum	2008-2020		Democratic
Justice Allen Loughry	2013-2024		Republican

Chief justice

The Chief Justice position rotates among the justices each year. Robin Jean Davis is the 2010 chief justice. The 2009 chief justice was Brent Benjamin.

2012 election

Candidates are competing for two seats.

To organize the columns, click on the arrows in the column heading.

Candidate	Incumbency	Party	Primary Vote	Election Vote
LoughryAllen Loughry   A	No	Republican		26.27%   A
RogersH. John Rogers	No	Democratic	9%
BeaneJ.D. Beane	No	Democratic	11%
RoweJames J. Rowe	No	Democratic	20%
YoderJohn Yoder	No	Republican		23.92%   D
ChafinLetitia Chafin	No	Democratic	27%A	22.69%   D
PalmerLouis Palmer	No	Democratic	6%
DavisRobin Jean Davis   A	Yes	Democratic	28%A	27.11%   A

Jurisdiction

The court has original jurisdiction on matters of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and certiorari. The court also interprets the law and the constitution.

Judicial selection

Each of the five justices on the Supreme Court of Appeals in West Virginia serves terms of 12 years. In the case of a vacancy, the Governor of the state appoints the justice. That appointed justice must then run in the next general election.

Qualifications

Justices must have practiced law for at least 10 years.

Caseloads

Year	Total filings	Total dispositions
2010	1,668	2,782
2009	1,917	3,589
2008	2,411	4,102
2007	3,954	2,532
2006	3,544	2,721
2005	2,983	2,396

Schedule of the court

There are two terms of the Court each year. The first term begins on the second Tuesday in January and ends in July. The second term begins on the first Wednesday in September and ends in December. The time period between terms is called "sine die," which is Latin for "without day." When the Court is in session, the justices hear cases and deliver opinions. At other times, the justices consider the emergency business that comes before the Court. In addition to its judicial functions, the Supreme Court of Appeals has administrative and regulatory responsibilities. The Court has adopted a Code of Judicial Conduct, Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law, Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules of Judicial Disciplinary Procedure and Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure.

Salaries

Yearly salary for both the associate justices and the Chief Justice is $121,000 as of January 2009.

History of the court

U.S. Supreme Court asked to intervene

The New York Times reported in October of 2008 that the nation's court of last resort will potentially hear three cases dealing with businesses and their right to appeal, as well as influence over, the West Virginia Supreme Court. One of the cases involves current Justice Benjamin's refusal to recuse himself from a pending case before the West Virginia bench in which one of Benjamin's past campaign contributors (more than $3 million) is involved; at issue is due process. Benjamin has "twice joined a 3-to-2 majority throwing out a $50 million verdict against the company," the paper reported. The case (Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Company No. 08-22) has accrued supporting briefs from the American Bar Association and the Brennan Center for Justice. The contributor has filed briefs asking that the Supreme Court not hear the case, calling it “a grand conspiracy theory," and further commenting that the United States Supreme Court “has never adopted a ‘looks bad’ due process test.”

The second appeal, Massey Energy v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (No. 08-218), also revolves around Massey Energy's influence over the court; Massey briefs claim that statements made by sitting Justice Larry Starcher against the energy company require Starcher's recusal from the case in question. Massey takes a different position in a second appeal to the United States Supreme Court, this one urging the court to disqualify Justice Starcher, he of the intemperate remarks. “There would be no inconsistency” in granting that appeal while turning back the one concerning Justice Benjamin, a Massey brief said, because Justice Starcher’s bias was manifest while Justice Benjamin’s conflict of interest, if there was one, was a question of appearances only.

In a classic "I'll do it if you do" move, Starcher has said he'll recuse himself only if Benjamin recuses himself from Caperton. At issue in the third appeal is whether or not companies hit with massive punitive damages lawsuits have a right to appeal to the state supreme court. Currently, West Virginia "[does] not guarantee at least one level of appellate review in civil cases." It is one of two states, Virginia being the other, that does not guarantee appellate reviews.

Legal study

In a Metro News op-ed titled "We can figure this out," lawyers for the Peyton Law Firm advocate commissioning a disinterested firm to study how West Virginia could improve its judicial system. The editorial bemoans the two great factions influencing judicial operations--the plaintiffs' bar and big business--as well as the lack of appeals courts. Using the 2008 West Virginia Supreme Court election for the backdrop, the editorial criticizes the recent move by two special interest groups to attempt to convince federal judges to throw out election laws in order to attack candidates with anonymity. It goes on to assert this year's election will do little to change the fact that "Ideology has largely replaced qualifications as a defining characteristic for court candidates."

External links

• WTRF "Supreme Court Announces Appellate Rule Changes", May 12, 2010
• Should We Keep this Court? An Economic Examination of Recent Decisions Made by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
• West Virginia Supreme Court Official Site
• Fringe Tactics: Special Interest Groups Target Judicial Races
• Report analyzes economic effect of W.Va. SC
• Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia 2006 Statistical Report
• State bar hears from Supreme Court candidates
• State Supreme Court race was the priciest primary
• Discussion of influence of money on the race
• WV Law on disclosing funding information of political ads struck down
• The West Virginia Record "Bill to fund Supreme Court elections still alive" 3/10/2011
• The West Virginia Record "Judicial pay raise bill under scrutiny," 2/24/2011

References

Portions of this article have been taken from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Copyright Notice can be found here.

This State Supreme Courts and Justices article does not have an image.

---